Posts Tagged ‘electric cars’
Correction: Make that increased sales of its GASOLINE-fueled cars. The $16,500 Chevy Cruze is the leader.
The $41,000 electric Chevy “Volt,” fueled by nuclear and coal power, continues to be a dud with real American buyers. So, good capitalists all, General Motors is having Obama buy them all. With his stash. (more…)
Commentary By Jane Jamison
California’s ridiculous environmentalist movement is about to be shown the folly of its ways. A new study shows the “electric cars” so prized by the “green movement” will never be economically feasible in California due to our electrical rates.
Consumers are going to be “shocked” by what their electric cars will cost to charge, and most likely will come crying to state or local government to subsidize charging stations. Good luck with that! pfft.
Taxpayers will be enraged as they begin to figure out what has been done to them by the “green movement” but it will be too late. Companies are running for the border, taking jobs with them. Those who are left with their silly electric cars and “green laws” will pay and pay and pay. (more…)
Americans are being inundated with claims about renewable and alternative energy. Advocates for these technologies say that if we jettison fossil fuels, we’ll breathe easier, stop global warming and revolutionize our economy. Yes, “green” energy has great emotional and political appeal. But before we wrap all our hopes — and subsidies — in it, let’s take a hard look at some common misconceptions about what “green” means.
1. Solar and wind power are the greenest of them all.
Unfortunately, solar and wind technologies require huge amounts of land to deliver relatively small amounts of energy, disrupting natural habitats. Even an aging natural gas well producing 60,000 cubic feet per day generates more than 20 times the watts per square meter of a wind turbine. A nuclear power plant cranks out about 56 watts per square meter, eight times as much as is derived from solar photovoltaic installations. The real estate that wind and solar energy demand led the Nature Conservancy to issue a report last year critical of “energy sprawl,” including tens of thousands of miles of high-voltage transmission lines needed to carry electricity from wind and solar installations to distant cities.
Nor does wind energy substantially reduce CO2 emissions. Since the wind doesn’t always blow, utilities must use gas- or coal-fired generators to offset wind’s unreliability. The result is minimal — or no — carbon dioxide reduction. (more…)