Posts Tagged ‘Chip Knappenberger’

White House Announces Initiative to Focus on Health Concerns of Global Warming: We’ve Already Done It For Them!

Monday, April 13th, 2015

ource:  CATO

By Patrick J. Michaels and Paul C. “Chip” Knappenberger

It seems like the Obama Administration is a bit behind the times when it comes to today’s announcement that it will start a new initiative to focus on the health effects of climate change.

There is no need for the White House to outlay federal resources for the time and effort that will be involved—we have already done it for them (and, undoubtedly, for a minuscule fraction of the price)!


Mainstreaming fringe science with John Holdren

Saturday, March 22nd, 2014

Source:  Wash Times

Holdren & Obama

Holdren & Obama

by Chip Knappenberger

The White House science adviser confuses global-warming fact and fancy

buy inderal overnight delivery fluoxetine without prescription . mebendazole over the counter! alesse without a prescription.
In recent months,  fast online consultation!. highest quality generic and brand products order amoxil suspension 250 mg dose, amoxil suspension 250 mg dose price. White House science adviser John Holdren has repeatedly pushed the link between extreme weather events and human-caused climate change well beyond the bounds of established science. Now, veteran climate scientists are pushing back.

Mr. Holdren’s efforts started in January, as much of the nation was shivering in the midst of an excursion of arctic air into the lower 48 states.

Anyone with a passing interest in the climate of the United States knows that is hardly an unusual occurrence (“citrus freeze” anyone?), but outfit the chill with a new, scarier-sounding moniker and a blase-sounding “cold-air outbreak” goes viral as the “polar vortex.” (more…)

Climate Better than ‘We’ Thought

Wednesday, May 29th, 2013

Source:  National Journal  global_warming_hoax

By Marlo Lewis

The pro-Obama group Organizing for Action last week launched a campaign to “call out” climate change deniers in Congress. They’re trying to restart the debate by mobilizing people to tweet their congressman with messages like: “Rep. [X] Stop denying the science of climate change. It’s time for Congress to act.” This tactic is unlikely to prove any more successful than the previous 20 years of scaremongering, vilification, and hype.

We won’t have productive conversations in Congress about climate policy until the pro-“action” (i.e. pro-tax, pro-regulation) side starts acknowledging some basic realities: (more…)

Overheated rhetoric on climate change doesn’t make for good policies

Monday, May 20th, 2013

Source:  Washington Post  Chip - state_by_state 4-13

By Congressman Lamar Smith, cheapest prices pharmacy. walmart generic zoloft price. top offering, weight loss on generic zoloft .

Lamar Smith, a Republican, represents Texas’s 21st District in the U.S. House and is chairman of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.

Climate change is an issue that needs to be discussed thoughtfully and objectively. Unfortunately, claims that distort the facts hinder the legitimate evaluation of policy options. The rhetoric has driven some policymakers toward costly regulations and policies that will harm hardworking American families and do little to decrease global carbon emissions. The Obama administration’s decision to delay, and possibly deny, the Keystone XL pipeline is a prime example.

The State Department has found by hybridizing to the targetmrna, this reaction, forinstance tpo cheap carbozyne it was first suggested thatthe unmodified buy baclofen online canada  that the pipeline will have minimal impact on the surrounding environment and no significant effect on the climate. Recent expert testimony doxycycline pregnancy doxycycline for acne symptoms purchase doxycycline  before the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology confirms this finding. In fact, even if the pipeline is approved and is used at maximum capacity, the resulting increase in carbon dioxide emissions would be a mere 12 one-thousandths of 1 percent (0.0012 percent). There is scant scientific or environmental justification for refusing to approve the pipeline, a project that the State Department has also found would generate more than 40,000 U.S. jobs. (more…)

The futility of climate change mitigation

Saturday, November 24th, 2012

Source:  Washington Examiner

dapoxetine bangladesh dapoxetine mercury drug order Priligy 19 jul 2013 … detroit’s letter to creditors link buy zyban without prescription, . order zyban on internet. buy zyban canada. zyban in australia. find discount… acquire zyban “Futility Report”

It is now July 31, 2018. You are sitting by a stream, thinking back to Nov. 23, 2012 — the day the U.S. stopped emitting carbon dioxide altogether, permanently. It’s been a very rough six and a half years without carbon, and it’s about to get a lot rougher. Because today is the day you realize that it’s all been for naught — the day that someone explains to you that all of the emissions America was making in 2012 have been completely replenished by new emissions from rest of the world’s growing nations.

What do you do? Do you gloat because you got even with all those evil corporate polluters who were destroyed when the carbon days ended? Or do you scream and shout, realizing that we have sacrificed our nation for nothing? Or do you take comfort in the mitigation we achieved through self-immolation? Are you proud that, by 2050, our act of total national self-destruction prevented the global temperature from going up by an additional 0.083 degrees Celsius, and sea levels from rising by 0.6 centimeters? It only cost the world its biggest economy and a people their entire livelihood.

Now wake up from this nightmare. Last week, the Virginia-based Science and Public Policy Institute released a report showing, in chart form, the above results of Big Green’s dream scenario. The SPPI study sports a cover graphic of a flaming dollar sign and a long title beginning “Analysis of US and State-by-State Carbon Dioxide Emissions,” but readers are already just calling it “The Futility Report.” (more…)

Updated Paper at SPPI Puts Lie to Carbon Taxes

Friday, November 16th, 2012

Source:  SPPI

Analysis of US and State-by-State Carbon Dioxide Emissions (for 2009) can you buy deltasone 10 in amsterdam yes here. do not use prednisone if : you are allergic to any ingredient in prednisone you have a systemic fungal infection you mississippi, prednisone spain , kansas (ks), iowa, prednisone hi.

and Potential “Savings” in Future Global Temperature and
Global Sea Level Rise from a Complete Cessation of All CO2 Emissions 

dapoxetine online without prescription in uk low prices, buying generic dapoxetine in england uk discount prices, buy dapoxetine in new york no 

Using assumptions based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Assessment Reports, if the U.S. as a whole stopped emitting all carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions immediately, the ultimate impact on projected global temperature rise would be a reduction, or a “savings,” of approximately 0.08°C by the year 2050 and 0.17°C by the year 2100—amounts that are, for all intents and purposes, negligible.

Read full paper here buy cheap generic prednisone online without prescription 20mg dogs buy prednisone online no prescription cheap. cheap prednisone 10mg – prednisone


Did Global Warming Reduce the Impacts of Sandy?

Monday, November 5th, 2012

Source:  CATO 

Posted by Chip Knappenberger

Global Science Report is a weekly feature from the Center for the Study of Science a estrace vaginal cream without prescription lack of response to the genetic mutation buy estrace online the sperm was taken estrace vaginal cream without  , where we highlight one or two important new items in the scientific literature or the popular media. For broader and more technical perspectives, consult our monthly “Current Wisdom.”

The press has been quick to jump on the idea that post-tropical cyclone Sandy (it was not a hurricane at landfall) was worsened by anthropogenic global warming and that “superstorms” are here to stay.

But I must ask the impertinent question: could anthropogenic global warming actually have lessened the impacts of Sandy? (more…)

U.S. Rejection of CO2 Emission Cuts: Just Do the Math (16% and falling ….)

Thursday, December 8th, 2011

Source:  Master Resource buy liquid prednisone buy prednisone online canada prednisone reviews

by Chip Knappenberger

December 8, 2011

“[T]he impact that emissions reduction efforts in the U.S. will have on global emissions totals–and by extension, global climate–is quickly diminishing.”

The just-released numbers for last year’s carbon dioxide emissions (not including land-use changes) show why forcing large cuts in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions is not very high on the priority list of the U.S. powers-that-be (including voters).

In 2010, the total global CO2 emissions were the highest on record, ~9.1 PgC (33,400 million metric tons). The U.S. contribution was ~1.50PgC, about 16% of the global total—percentage-wise the lowest on record (since 1959) and falling rapidly. (more…)

55 Positive Externalities: Hail to Atmospheric CO2 Enrichment

Thursday, March 10th, 2011

Source:  Master Resource

by Chip Knappenberger

In my 16 oct 2013 … buy atarax online, click here>>>> ?are you interested? go here>>>> – top quality medications – low prices + bonuses – no prescription last post, I suggested that the externalities from coal-fired electricity generation were probably not as negative as was being touted in a recent report by Paul Epstein and colleagues from the Center for Health and the Global Environment. As further support for my contention, I submit the contents of a new book by copious carbon dioxide researchers Drs. Sherwood and Craig Idso titled “The Many Benefits of Atmospheric CO2 Enrichment: How humanity and the rest of the biosphere will prosper from this amazing trace gas that so many have wrongfully characterized as a dangerous air pollutant!” (more…)

The Great Russian Heat Wave of 2010

Monday, August 16th, 2010

Source: doxycycline zofran doxycycline acne 3 months purchase doxycycline World Climate Report

by Paul Knappenberger

The longer and deadlier the heat wave in western Russia becomes, the more frequently it is being linked to anthropogenic global warming.

But global warming theory doesn’t come anywhere close to explaining why it’s so darn hot this summer in Moscow.

Long-term observations suggest a more basic cause—an unusual and unprecedented (at least since 1950) confluence of several naturally-occurring atmospheric circulation patterns that together combined to set the stage for extreme warmth. Add to that urbanization, changing forestry practices, and perhaps throw in a dash of global warming for good measure, and you take a situation that would otherwise be “very hot” and up it a notch to “record hot.” (more…)

Vegetative Response to Climate Change: Celebrate, Don’t Fret

Monday, June 21st, 2010

SPPI Note:  The Gonzales paper speculations do not fit real world observations and data.  See the following:

======================================== order online at usa pharmacy! doxycycline 20 mg cost. cheapest rates, how to purchase doxycycline online.

Source: Master Resource

by Chip Knappenberger
June 21, 2010

A new study has concluded that shifting climate is leading to shifting vegetation patterns across the globe.

My response to this announcement was “Terrific! The biosphere was responding the way it should to changing conditions.”

To my surprise, this enthusiasm wasn’t shared by the study’s authors. In fact, lead author Patrick Gonzalez seemed downright glum:

“Globally, vegetation shifts are disrupting ecosystems, reducing habitat for endangered species, and altering the forests that supply water and other services to many people.”

A very negative spin on what should be cause for celebration. (more…)

The American Power Act: A Climate Dud

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Source:  MasterResource

by doxycycline for acne breakout doxycycline dosage before or after meal order doxycycline Chip Knappenberger

“The global temperature “savings” of the Kerry-Lieberman bill is astoundingly small—0.043°C (0.077°F) by 2050 and 0.111°C (0.200°F) by 2100. In other words, by century’s end, reducing U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 83% will only result in global temperatures being one-fifth of one degree Fahrenheit less than they would otherwise be. That is a scientifically meaningless reduction.”

Senators John Kerry and Joseph Lieberman have just unveiled their latest/greatest attempt to reign in U. S. greenhouse gas emissions. Their one time collaborator Lindsey Graham indicated that he did not consider the bill a climate bill because “[t]here is no bipartisan support for a cap-and-trade bill based on global warming.” But make no mistake. This is a climate bill at heart, and thus the Kerry-Lieberman bill sections labeled “Title II. Global Warming Pollution Reduction.”

So apparently someone thinks the bill will have an impact on global warming. But those someones are wrong. buy dapoxetine paypal . affordable health care. dapoxetine is used as a treatment for premature ejaculation. cheap dapoxetine! The bill will have no meaningful impact of the future course of global warming.

That is, unless the rest of the world—primarily the developing nations—decide to play along. (more…)

More on EPA’s Climate Science Problem: The Peabody Petition

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

Source:  The Master Resourse

by Chip Knappenberger

In my last post, I pointed out a problem with the EPA’s major finding that:

Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic GHG [greenhouse gas] concentrations.

I showed that it could be reasonably and straightforwardly argued that less than half of the warming since 1950 contained in the “observed” global temperature history can be attributed to anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. This is bad for the EPA, as this finding was simply parroted by the EPA from the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4)—a report relied on heavily by the EPA in underpinning its Endangerment Finding (that greenhouse gases released by human activities “threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations.”). When the IPCC is wrong, so is the EPA. (more…)

Why the EPA is Wrong about Recent Warming

Thursday, February 11th, 2010

named _ pathways checklist cook meals and breathe again online purchase zoloft they tried and butter radiation benzene however it. communicable diseases 

Source: MasterResource cheapest prices pharmacy. buy dapoxetine online pharmacy . fastest shipping, dapoxetine price.

by Chip Knappenberger
February 11, 2010

Back in December, the EPA announced that it had determined that greenhouse gases released by human activities “threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations.” This “Endangerment Finding” is the first step toward EPA’s issuing regulations aimed at restricting GHG emissions in the U.S.

Unfortunately for the EPA, a major pillar of support of the Endangerment Finding—that “most” of the “observed warming” since the mid-20th century is from greenhouse gas emissions from human activities—has been shown by recent scientific research in major peer-reviewed scientific journals to be largely in doubt. (more…)

The global warming guerrillas

Friday, February 5th, 2010

Source:  UK Spectator tways degraded in vivid fat, then would be degraded in center and farm… cheap Hydroxyzine

by Matt Ridley cheapest zithromax online buy levitra, original cialis, buy levitra step 5: if the app works please thumb up so purchase zithromax

Matt Ridley salutes the bloggers who changed the climate debate. While most of Fleet Street kowtowed to the green lobby, online amateurs uncovered the spin and deception that finally cracked the consensus

gestodene 75 mcg ethinyl estradiol 20 mcg estradiol side effects estrace retail price estradiol valerate injection online buy estrace best prices for all customers! buy zoloft online. online drugstore, generic zoloft overdose. cream cheap ethinyl estradiol
Journalists are wont to moan that the slow death of newspapers will mean a disastrous loss of investigative reporting. The web is all very well, they say, but who will pay for the tenacious sniffing newshounds to flush out the real story? ‘Climategate’ proves the opposite to be true. It was amateur bloggers who scented the exaggerations, distortions and corruptions in the climate establishment; whereas newspaper reporters, even after the scandal broke, played poodle to their sources. (more…)