Time for global warming lobby to admit they could be wrong, says meteorologist

Source:  UK Telegraph

Here?s something you?ll never hear from the Met Office. Joe Bastardi, a senior meteorologist at AccuWeather, has laid into the the global warming lobby for making absurd claims, especially their assertion that the cold weather is caused by global warming.

First he told Fox Business Network last week that: ?These folks claiming that global warming is causing severe cold ? that?s like the kid on the playground who doesn?t get his way and takes his ball home?. In fact, the cold weather ?is predictable if you study cycles, if you study climatology? and don?t just say everything is global warming?.

And now he?s continued the offensive on his blog this week, writing that:

My advice is to get ready for more of this [cold weather] in coming decades. And the CO2 people should open their eyes to other sides of the argument, since in 30 years or so when we come out of the cooling cycle, there may be room for your argument being pressed forth? but first we have to watch and see if the naturalists like me (that is my new nickname? nature boy) have a point.

Ozone hole, Ice Age, Y2K, etc, etc, etc. Is it any wonder why this just looks like another in a string of missed ideas that cause needless worry? You know what is the most hideous thing about all this? The money, time and energy wasted on what may be nothing more than a fictional ghost that man has nothing to do with, while tangible societal problems that need attention are given the short end of the stick. And it?s interesting to see that whether by magic, coincidence, or lord forbid, the actual ideas laid out here a few years ago as to why this [the cooling] is going to start happening again, WHO THE TRUE DENIERS ARE!

This is a big deal, because here we have one of the world?s biggest meteorological firms saying the global warming consensus is probably wrong. Of course, in the world of politics, no one is allowed to say this without being falsely demonised for ?denying the science?. Yet the science is irrelevant to a theory that has always been little more than an excuse to expand the state. And that is why ? in an increasingly cold climate ? the true believers are upset.