Europe Concedes Defeat: Developing Nations Reject Green Agenda

Source:  GWPF

Europe Concedes Defeat: Developing Nations Reject Green Agenda

Nick Clegg, Britain?s Deputy Prime Minister, has admitted that the Rio+20 deal is ?disappointing.? He blamed China and other developing countries that have huge reserves of coal and want to continue using fossil fuels to grow, for failing to back plans for the green economy. ?The political significance of Rio is that the G77 nations are antagonistic to our European ideas on the green economy,? said Mr Clegg. He said Europe can no longer take the lead in such international negotiations because power is shifting “from West to East”. –Louise Gray, The Daily Telegraph, 22 June 2012

The ?failure? of Rio+20 is a cause for celebration, even if you can?t afford the champagne and foie gras that ecocrats served themselves as their hopes for ?Sustainia? retreated into the policy fog. The high priests of the new green world order crave cash, but calls for humanity to fork over for Gaia?s ?services? are falling on deaf ears. The Rio+20 text was originally sold as promoting ?The Future We Want.? However, the ?We? in question was always a self-selected group of UN bureaucrats, alarmist NGOs, corporate rent-seekers and main chancers whose interests were sharply at odds with those of ordinary people. Rio+20?s failure should be celebrated as The Future We Avoided. –Peter Foster, Financial Post, 22 June 2012 Protest erupted in the Rio+20 conference centre on Thursday as civil rights groups carried out a “ritual rip-up” of a negotiating text that they condemn as a betrayal of future generations. “We were promised leaps and bounds but this agreement barely moves us forward by inches,” shouted Cam Fenton, a Canadian in the Major Group of Children and Youth, as protesters ripped up a giant mock text that they called “The Future We Bought”. “World leaders have delivered something that fails to move the world forward from the first Rio summit, showing up with empty promises at Rio+20,” said Miariana Calderon, a young woman from California. “This text is a polluters’ plan, and unless people start listening to the people, history will remember it as a failure for the people and the planet.” –Jonathan Watts, The Guardian, 21 June 2012

So the world is left debating sustainable development, a nebulous concept at best. At the 1992 Earth Summit, the ?Agenda 21? document set out how sustainable development was to be implemented across the world. It was described to me by Brazil?s environment minister at the time as an ?NGO fantasy,? which is what the world?s largest gathering of leaders will be discussing in Rio this week. –Rupert Darwall, Financial Post, 20 June 2012

Climate science has transformed itself from a research backwater a few decades ago into one of the greatest public-good scientific cash cows ever devised. The livelihood of most climate scientists is now dependent on government grants. It is not a situation conducive to sceptical outlook and balanced advice. –Garth Paltridge, The Australian Financial Review, 22 June 2012

The Harper government?s confrontation with the opposition parties over Bill C-38 was the parliamentary manifestation of an epic clash between two titanic constituencies. In one camp are resource extraction entrepreneurs seeking less fettered access to the treasures of Western and Northern Canada. They look to Asia for investors and customers. The rival camp are rentiers from Central and Atlantic Canada who are economically and ideologically aligned with their counterparts in Western Europe and the US Northeast. They want to preserve the wealth within their realm. They favour neo-corporatist and quasi-autarkist. –William Kay, Environmentalism is Fascism, June 2012

If the IPCC wanted to provide ammunition for climate change skeptics, they just handed over an entire arsenal. They are now saying the IPCC never had the best scientists in the field, they picked them based on how diverse it made the IPCC look. Obviously this could have advantages for people other than obscure female scientists in Brazil. I can write a blog post saying something important and it could be included in an IPCC report in 2013.  Unfortunately, since 2001 the prestige of being cited by the IPCC has dropped a lot. ?Hank Campbell, Science 2.0, 20 June 2012

Governments’ inability to address energy poverty in Southeastern Europe is increasing the threat of deforestation, as illegal timbering is seen by needy people as their only chance for survival through harsh winters. Until the governments in the countries address energy poverty which touches large parts of the population, the region will face the threat of massive deforestation, experts told EurActiv. —EurActiv, 22 June 2012

As budgetary pressures continue to dictate the political reality, the Golden State has decided to hand over the management reigns of six major state parks to private companies. Turning parks over to private enterprise is what most California Democrats would consider a thought crime; if Republicans did it they would be denounced as the worst kind of villains, turning poor little Bambi over to Halliburton. But despite deploying every liberal nostrum known to man, despite all those wise ?green jobs? initiatives and all that ?smart growth?, California is an economic and budgetary basket case. And so it has no choice, and it is privatizing the administration of some of its public parks because there isn?t any money to do it the Rube Goldberg California state government way. In deep-blue California, it?s privatize or close. –Walter Russell Mead, The American Interest, 21 June 2012