Source: Global Warming. Org
Attorney Peter Glaser?s ?Morning After? Reflections on the D.C. Circuit Court GHG Decision
Despite the disappointing decision yesterday, it would be well to remember that the real damage was done in the Supreme Court?s 5-4 Massachusetts decision, where EPA was found to have authority to regulate GHGs under the CAA so long as it determined that GHGs endanger the public health and welfare.
. . .the Massachusetts decision was a real travesty. It is impossible to review the history of the public debate on GHG regulation in this country beginning in the 1980s, when potential climate change first came to prominence, and conclude that authority to regulate GHGs was always available, hiding in plain sight in the CAA as first enacted in 1970. The Supreme Court said in the 2001 American Trucking Associations decision, in language that is often cited, that Congress does not ?hide elephants in mouseholes.? Evidently, in the case of EPA GHG regulation, Congress did.