Archive for April, 2012

James Lovelock: I Was ‘Alarmist’ About Climate Change

Thursday, April 26th, 2012


by Ian Johnston,

James Lovelock, the maverick scientist who became a guru to the environmental movement with his ?Gaia? theory of the Earth as a single organism, has admitted to being ?alarmist? about climate change and says other environmental commentators, such as Al Gore, were too.

British environmental guru James Lovelock, seen on March 17, 2009 in Paris, admits he was “alarmist” about climate change in the past. (more…)

The folly of E15 anti-hydrocarbon policies

Thursday, April 26th, 2012

EPA?s E-15 ethanol plan is bad for our pocketbooks, environment and energy policy

by Paul Driessen

The Obama Administration?s anti-hydrocarbon ideology and ?renewable? energy mythology continues to subsidize crony capitalists and the politicians they help keep in office ? on the backs of American taxpayers, ratepayers and motorists. The latest chapter in the sorry ethanol saga is a perfect example.

Bowing to pressure from ADM, Cargill, Growth Energy and other Big Ethanol lobbyists, Lisa Jackson?s Environmental Protection Agency has decided to allow ethanol manufacturers to register as suppliers of E15 gasoline. E15 contains 15% ethanol, rather than currently mandated 10% blends.

The next lobbying effort will focus on getting E15 registered as a fuel in individual states and persuading oil companies to offer it at service stations. But according to the Associated Press and Washington Post, Team Obama already plans to provide taxpayer-financed grants, loans and loan guarantees to ?help station owners install 10,000 blender pumps over the next five years? and promote the use of biofuels.  (more…)

“If I wanted America to Fail”

Thursday, April 26th, 2012

Citizens For Limited Government: The environmental agenda has been infected by extremism?it’s become an economic suicide pact. And we’re here to challenge it. On Earth Day, visit

Obama: Climate change will be a campaign issue

Thursday, April 26th, 2012


By Dan Berman

President Barack Obama says the amount of money poured into fighting the scientific consensus on climate change will push the issue into the presidential campaign.

In an interview with Rolling Stone published Wednesday, Obama also says he’s worried about the lack of international progress to address global warming and believes that is tied to frustration with the Keystone XL pipeline.

“Part of the challenge over these past three years has been that people’s number-one priority is finding a job and paying the mortgage and dealing with high gas prices,” Obama said. “In that environment, it’s been easy for the other side to pour millions of dollars into a campaign to debunk climate-change science. (more…)

Coal Ash Regulation: Another Front on the ?War Against Coal?

Monday, April 23rd, 2012

Source:  Master Resource

?For three years the Environmental Protection Agency has imposed a de facto ban on new coal-fired power while doing everything it can to harm existing coal plants.?

– ?Killing Coal,? Wall Street Journal, April 5, 2012.

Unhappy with the speed of EPA regulation of coal combustion by-products, a number of environmental organizations recently filed a lawsuit to force EPA to finalize regulation of coal ash.

A natural byproduct of the combustion process for coal-fired power plants, coal ash is typically stored onsite at power plants or sold on the open market for use in the production of concrete and other materials. In 2010, EPA proposed a pair of regulatory approaches for dealing with coal ash, but has to yet to decide how to regulate the material.

Nearly a dozen groups were party to the lawsuit, including the Sierra Club, the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, and the Environmental Integrity Project. 1 The lawsuit comes just days after the EPA announced plans to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from the energy sector, which the New York Times characterized as EPA?s movement toward ?closing out the era of old-fashioned coal-burning power generation.? So much for Obama?s all-of-the-above energy policy. (more…)

Things more worrisome than AGW: Dying Middle Class

Friday, April 20th, 2012



25 Signs That Middle Class Families Have Been Targeted For Extinction

by Michael Snyder

The middle class in America is being systematically wiped out, and most people don?t even realize what is happening.  Every single year, millions more Americans fall out of the middle class and become dependent on the government.  The United States once had the largest and most vibrant middle class in the history of the world, but now the middle class is rapidly shrinking and government dependence is at an all-time high.  So why is this happening?  Well, America is becoming a poorer nation at the same time that wealth is becoming extremely concentrated at the very top.  At this point, our economic system is designed to funnel as much money and power to the federal government and to the big corporations as possible.  Individuals and small businesses have a really hard time thriving in this environment.  To most big corporations these days, workers are viewed as financial liabilities.  Most corporations want to reduce their payrolls as much as possible.  You see, the truth is that most corporations want to be just like Apple.  If you can believe it, Apple makes $400,000 in profit per employee.  Big corporations don?t care that you need to pay the mortgage and provide for your family.  Their goal is to make as much money as possible.  And most of the control freaks that run our bloated federal government don?t care much about middle class families either.  To many politicians and federal bureaucrats, middle class families are ?useless eaters? that are constantly damaging the environment with their ?excessive? lifestyles.  In this day and age, neither the federal government nor the big corporations really have much use for middle class Americans, and that is really, really bad news for the the future of the middle class family in America.

There are three key factors that are constantly chipping away at the middle class?. (more…)

Attrbibution of the Warm Winter To Global Warming ? An Example Of The Mistatement Of Reality By Some Climate Scientists

Monday, April 16th, 2012

Source:  Climate science

There is a news article with the header

Not just March, but start of 2012 shatter US records for heat, worrying meteorologists

by Seth Borenstein

Excerpts from the article read [with my comments inserted]

It?s not just March.

?It?s been ongoing for several months,? said Jake Crouch, a climate scientist at NOAA?s National Climatic Data Center in Asheville, N.C.

Meteorologists say an unusual confluence of several weather patterns, including La Nina, was the direct cause of the warm start to 2012. While individual events cannot be blamed on global warming, Crouch said this is like the extremes that are supposed to get more frequent because of man-made climate change. Greenhouse gases come from the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and oil.

My Comment:  The highlighted text is yet another example where unsubstantiated claims are made to infer that these extremes are a result of added CO2. Yet what Mr. Crouch ignored is that in March, the global average lower tropospheric temperature anomalies were only +0.11C above the 30 year average for March (see)! The lower tropospheric anomalies are ~0.4C cooler than in early 2010. (more…)

Richard Lindzen: Response To The Critique Of My House Of Commons Lecture

Monday, April 16th, 2012

Source:  Global Warming Policy Foundation

by Dr. Richard Lindzen

Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT. Cambridge, MA 02139, USA


On February 22, 2012, I gave a lecture at the House of Commons explaining the nature of the arguments for climate alarm, and offering my reasons for regarding the concern as being unjustifiably exaggerated. The slides of this lecture were widely circulated. Not surprisingly, the lecture led to a variety of complaints from those supporting alarm. The most thoughtful of these (by Hoskins, Mitchell, Palmer, Shine and Wolff) was a detailed critique posted at the website of the Grantham Institute that Hoskins heads. While there was a considerable amount of agreement between the critics and myself, the overall tenor of the critique suggested that I was presenting a misleading position. The following is my response to this critique. Since both the critique and my lecture focused on the science, the discussion is, of necessity, technical. Moreover, there are distinct limits to what can be covered in a one hour lecture. The following provides more detail than could be included in the lecture.

The critique by Hoskins et al. of a lecture that I recently gave seems to be primarily a statement of subjective disagreement, though it has important errors, and is highly misleading. The critics are, for the most part, scientists for whom I have considerable respect. The following response to their critique will, I hope, be considered to be part of a constructive exchange. Such constructive exchanges are new in the field of global warming, and, perhaps, represent a return to the normal process of scientific discourse. (more…)

No Sea Level Rise Acceleration ? Study Shows ?Similar Rates Could Also Be Identified Earlier In The Record?

Monday, April 16th, 2012

Source:  NoTrickZone

How often do we hear screams ?head for the hills, sea levels are rising fast!? from alarmists like James Extreme Hansen of GISS and Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)?

Yet, study after study show that there is no evidence of accelerating sea level rise. All sea level fluctuations are within the normal range of variation. Nothing unusual is happening. (more…)

Amazonian Plant Extinctions

Monday, April 16th, 2012

Source:  Climate Change Reconsidered

Feeley, K.J. and Silman, M.R. 2009. Extinction risks of Amazonian plant species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106: 12,382-12,387.

Writing in the pages of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Feeley and Silman (2009) say that “ongoing development of the Amazon, including natural gas and oil production, large-scale cattle ranching, soy farming, extended networks of improved roads, and the various synergistic activities that invariably accompany increased access, is causing the rapid loss and degradation of natural habitat,” which, as we all know, can lead to the extinctions of species that live there.

So just how serious is the situation? (more…)

Monday, April 16th, 2012

Source: Climate Change Reconsidered

Bali, R., Agarwal, K.K., Ali, S.N. and Srivastava, P. 2011. Is the recessional pattern of Himalayan glaciers suggestive of anthropogenically induced global warming? Arabian Journal of Geosciences 4: 1087-1093.

Bali et al. (2011) introduce their review of what is known about Himalayan glaciers by noting that a “glacial inventory carried out by the Geological Survey of India reveals the existence of over 9,000 valley glaciers in India and at least about 2,000 glaciers in Nepal and Bhutan,” citing Raina (2006). And they say that “following the alarmist approach of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC),” a number of subsequent reports related to the bleak future of Himalayan glaciers have been issued, mainly through the media. These reports, as they describe them, have suggested that “almost all Indian glaciers including the Gangotri glacier will vanish from the Earth in the next few decades.” More particularly, they say the reports suggest that “initially, there would be flooding followed by the drying of glacial fed rivers of the Indian subcontinent, desertification, rise of sea level, submergence of the coastal areas, spread of diseases, drop in the production of food grains, etc.,” all due, of course, to “anthropogenically induced global warming.”

So what’s the real story? (more…)

US Water-year Runoff

Monday, April 16th, 2012

Source:  Climate Change Reconsidered

McCabe, G.J. and Wolock, D.M. 2011. Independent effects of temperature and precipitation on modeled runoff in the conterminous United States. Water Resources Research 47: 10.1029/2011WR010630.

Authors McCabe and Wolock (2011) write that “effects of global warming on streamflow magnitude are of particular concern given that these effects directly alter water supplies.” In this regard, however, they say that “previous studies of trends and variability of streamflow in the United States primarily have focused on the latter half of the 20th century,” noting that these trends “may not be representative of longer time periods.” Thus, they decided to significantly increase the time domain of their new study of the subject to cover the period 1900-2008, stating that it would “be informative to evaluate temporal patterns in streamflow over the longest possible period,” which is critically important, in light of the fact that Earth’s recovery from the global chill of the Little Ice Age began well over a century ago. (more…)

New question mark over global warming: Scientists discover glaciers in Asian mountain range are actually getting BIGGER

Monday, April 16th, 2012

Source:  UK Mail

Photos taken by a French satellite show glaciers in a mountain range west of the Himalayas have grown during the last decade.

The growing glaciers were found in the Karakoram range, which spans the borders between Pakistan, India and China and is home to the world’s second highest peak, K2.

The startling find has baffled scientists and comes at a time when glaciers in other parts of the region, and across the world, are shrinking.

French scientists from the National Centre for Scientific Research and the University of Grenoble, were forced to rely on satellite images, to study the region – because much of the Karakoram range is inaccessible. (more…)

The WWF?s Vast Pool of Oil Money

Wednesday, April 11th, 2012

Source:  No Frakking Concensus

The World Wildlife Fund?s first corporate sponsor was Shell oil ? which continued to fund it for the next four decades.

Remember the headline in The Independent that pointed an accusing finger: Think-tanks take oil money and use it to fund climate deniers (backup link)? And the Center for Media and Democracy?s claim that Oil Money Funds Climate Deniers and Attacks on Climate Scientists (backup). And CleanTechnica?s automatic assumption that any politician who accept donations from oil companies is therefore a ?shill for oil & gas interests? (backup).

In the simple-minded, comic book world in which many environmentalists live there?s only one acceptable view about climate change ? the one they themselves hold. Intelligent people couldn?t possibly have compelling reasons to see the world differently. There must be some (condescending and dehumanizing) explanation ? one that allows skeptics to be peremptorily dismissed, to be banished to that category of social rejects who need not be taken seriously.

We must be stupid. Or mentally ill. Or brainwashed by FoxNews. Most offensively of all it?s said that we?re being paid by big, bad oil companies to express particular views.

Well if oil money is corrupt and evil ? and if green activists really believe that those who take it are nefarious and untrustworthy ? why are there no websites analogous to Greenpeace?s ExxonSecrets about the very long, very close relationship that the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) has enjoyed with Shell (aka Royal Dutch Shell)? (more…)

Scott signs Florida cape and trade law repeal

Tuesday, April 10th, 2012

Source:  AP

Gov. Rick Scott has signed a bill repealing a cap and trade law designed to control power plant emissions in Florida.

Scott signed the bill (HB 4001) on Friday.

The law was never implemented since the Legislature passed it in 2008 at the urging of then-Gov. Charlie Crist.

It was intended as a market-based approach to controlling greenhouse gas emissions that are contributing to global warming.

The concept, though, has fallen out of favor among Republicans who control the Florida Legislature. They contend it would kill jobs and have questioned scientific evidence linking such emissions to climate change.