Source: Master Resource
?Mounting evidence [of lukewarming] begins to start to make you wonder whether there is some fundamental problem between climate models and reality.??To me, the most significant thing that the Climategate emails show is that the deck is stacked against the publication of research results that are critical of the established scientific consensus, and the skids are greased for papers that run in support?. Not a good situation for the advancement of science.?
?Lukewarmers? are those scientists (and others) who believe the balance of evidence is middling between ?climate alarmists? (who tend to think that the global temperature rise will lie in, or even exceed, the upper half the IPCC?s 1.1°C?6.4°C range of projected temperature rise this century) and ultraskeptics, or ?flatliners? (who tend to think that the addition of human-generated carbon dioxide has virtually no impact on global temperatures). (more…)