Archive for August, 2010

The Greening of Godzilla

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

by Walter Russell Mead


The rise of the environmental movement reflected the increasing independence of thought and judgment of a public that was becoming less and less impressed with credentials and degrees.  The public wanted to take power back from experts and appointed government agencies and put up new obstacles in the way of technocratic engineers with big projects in mind.

But when it comes to global warming, the shoe is on the other foot.  Now it is suddenly the environmentalists ? who?ve often spent lifetimes raging against experts and scientists who debunk organic food and insist that GMOs and nuclear power plants are safe ? who are the pious advocates of science and experts.  Suddenly, it?s a sin to question the wisdom of the Scientific Consensus.  Scientists are, after all, experts; their work is peer-reviewed and we uneducated rubes must sit back and shut up when the experts tell us what?s right. (more…)

Dump the IPCC Process, It Cannot Be Fixed

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Source:  Global Warming

by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.

In a recent opinion piece, Ross McKitrick has argued that the IPCC process needs to be fixed. He correctly points out that, “There is too much conflict of interest built into the report-writing process”.

But I say the process cannot be fixed. DUMP the IPCC process.

The reason why is because the IPCC process was never created to achieve what the U.N. claims, and what most people believe it exists for.

The IPCC was created to use the scientific community to build a case for regulating CO2 emissions. Period. (more…)

This Discredited IPCC Process Must Be Purged

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Source:  Opinion

by Matt Ridley

We cannot make sane decisions on global warming if the ‘experts’ present us with evidence that is biased

This month, after a three-year investigation, Harvard University suspended a prominent professor of psychology for scandalously overinterpreting videos of monkey behaviour. The incident has sent shock waves through science because it suggests that a body of data is unreliable. The professor, Marc Hauser, is now a pariah in his own field and his papers have been withdrawn. But the implications for society are not great — no policy had been based on his research.

Yesterday, after a four-month review, a committee of scientists concluded that the Nobel prize-winning Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has “assigned high confidence to statements for which there is very little evidence”, has failed to enforce its own guidelines, has been guilty of too little transparency, has ignored critical review comments and has had no policies on conflict of interest”. (more…)

Independent Audit Panel Slams U.N.’s Climate Group

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

[SPPI Note:  See SPPI papers on the IPCC:

We Have Been Conned – An Independent review of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

The IPCC can’t count its “Expert Scientists”: Author and Reviewer Numbers are Wrong

Climate Science Corrupted

Prejudiced Authors, Prejudiced Findings

Peer review? What peer review? ]


Source:  FOX News

By Jeremy A. Kaplan

Acknowledging flaws in its reports and growing public skepticism toward the theory of manmade global warming, the United Nations hired an independent review panel in March to audit its climate-science arm. The group found plenty of problems.

The InterAcademy Council, an independent group of scientists representing agencies from around the world, presented the findings of its five-month investigation Monday morning at the United Nations. The group took issue with the structure, methods and leadership of the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) — the group responsible for a 2007 report that erroneously forecast the imminent melting of Himalayan glaciers, the rate of melt of polar ice caps and dwindling Amazon rainforests. (more…)

InterAcademy Council: IPPC science and process deeply flawed

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Source: UK Express


THE world’s leading climate change body has been accused of losing credibility after a damning report into its research practices.

A high-level inquiry into the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found there was “little evidence” for its claims about global warming.

It also said the panel had emphasised the negative impacts of climate change and made “substantive findings” based on little proof. (more…)

Penn State Whitewash of Michael Mann “Investigation”

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Source: SPPI

by Charles Battig

An  insight into the apparent difference in how ?scientific misconduct?  at Harvard University is handled,  and  how it has been handled at Penn State and the University of Virginia in the matter of climatologist Michael Mann is now available.

Harvard professor of psychology Marc Hauser was found ?solely responsible for eight instances of scientific misconduct? involving the ?data acquisition, data analysis, data retention, and the reporting of research methodologies and results? according to the August 20, 2010 statement by Harvard dean Michael D. Smith.   This finding was issued based on a faculty investigating committee study.  The report noted that it began with an ?inquiry phase? in response to ?allegations of scientific misconduct.?  It seems that there were allegations of ?monkey business? in his research on monkey cognition. Three papers by Hauser, presumably peer reviewed, will need to be corrected or retracted according to Dean Smith.  The academic fate of the professor is yet to be decided. (more…)

The Clean Development Mechanism delivers the greatest green scam of all

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Source:  UK Telegraph

Even the UN and the EU are wising up to the greenhouse gas scam, “the biggest environmental scandal in history”, says Christopher Booker.

By Christopher Booker

Connie Hedegaard

Connie Hedegaard, the EU Commissioner for Climate Action Photo: AP

It is now six months since I reported on what even environmentalists are calling “the biggest environmental scandal in history”. Indeed this is a scam so glaringly bizarre that even the UN and the EU have belatedly announced that they are thinking of taking steps to stop it. The essence of the scam is that a handful of Chinese and Indian firms are deliberately producing large quantities of an incredibly powerful “greenhouse gas” which we in the West ? including UK taxpayers ? then pay them billions of dollars to destroy.

The key to this scam, designed to curb global warming, is a scheme known as the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), set up under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and administered by the UN. It enables firms and governments in the developed world to buy “credits” which allow them to continue emitting greenhouse gases. These are sold to them, through well-rewarded brokers, from firms in developing countries that can show they have nominally reduced their emissions. (more…)

Obama Urges Court to Vacate AGW Decision. I Smell a Rat (or Two!)

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Source:  Pajamamedia

This tactic points in only one direction: allowing an EPA power grab.

by Marlo Lewis

Last week, in a brief filed on behalf of six large electric power producers, the Obama administration urged the Supreme Court to vacate an appeals court decision (State of Connecticut et al. v. American Electric Power et al.) that would allow states and other parties to sue coal-burning electric utilities for their alleged contribution to global warming-related ?injuries.?

The brief clearly lays out the absurdities of attempting to regulate greenhouse gases via public nuisance litigation. Yet the brief stops short of reaching the obvious conclusion implied by its argument, namely that climate policy is a ?non-justiciable political question.? Instead, it advises the Supreme Court to direct the court of appeals to reassess its decision on ?prudential? grounds.

I smell a rat. The administration, I suspect, does not want the Court to rule that the political question doctrine precludes tort litigation against CO2-emitters, because it wants the only solid, durable shield for industry to be the EPA?s ?displacement? of common-law injury claims via the agency?s endangerment rule and ensuing regulatory cascade under the Clean Air Act (CAA). (more…)

Follow the money

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Source:  SPPI

Click here: Cancun climate summit: Pachauri asks Mexico to be realistic – Yahoo! India News

New Delhi, Aug 19 (PTI) With hopes of a consensus eluding the Cancun climate meet, IPCC chairman R K Pachauri has urged host Mexico to be realistic and work hard in pushing rich nations to put climate funds on the table. “There will be least expectations (of a consensus) this time (at Cancun).

I doubt if you will get anything close to a global agreement. It is not possible particularly considering the situation in some countries,” Pachauri said, apparently referring to delay of passage of US climate law. (more…)

Propaganda from the Public Purse

Tuesday, August 31st, 2010

Source:  SPPI

by Dennis Ambler

“Before becoming an expert on climate change communication, Ed Maibach went through a change of his own.

Back in 2005, Maibach and his wife joined some family members on an educational walking trip through the Dolomites in Italy. Members of the trip spent the mornings listening to leading climate scientists from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research and the afternoons climbing mountains.

There, they became familiar with climate change basics. The dramatically rising level of CO2 in our atmosphere is rapidly destabilizing our climate. The world?s population ? more than 6.5 billion people ? is growing and modernizing rapidly, leading to greater use of fossil fuels and deforestation. (more…)

Leftist Center for Biodiversity at it Again

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Source:  SPPI

by Dennis Ambler

Can the San Bernadino flying Squirrel be saved? Does it really need saving?

Environmentalists have petitioned the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to list the San Bernardino flying squirrel, a nocturnal glider native to Southern California mountains, as an endangered species, threatened by climate change. (more…)

Silencing global warming critics

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Source: American Thinker

Russell Cook

The Warmists are at it again, attempting to manipulate media coverage of global warming, in a manner reminiscent of JournoList members attempting to downplay troublesome Obama stories in the 2008 election. The is not the first time for such media manipulation, either.
Now, a reader tip at Anthony Watt’s popular blog site seems to indicate the Union of Concerned Scientists has set up, instead of a network to coordinate talking points, a media alert request page that could end up being an intimidation system against certain journalists. At the UCS web site, we are instructed to “Monitor the print and broadcast media outlets in your area and alert us to misrepresentations about global warming”. Considering the multi-tens-of-thousands of people reading Watts’s blogs, I think his followers are likely to crash the UCS email system with alerts about overblown reports of man-caused global warming. Following the article, one hilarious comment by Accu-Weather’s Joe Bastardi suggests a counter-group called “The Union of VERY concerned scientists.” (more…)

Rear Mirror: The EPA vs. Ed Krug over the Acid Rain Scare

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Source:  SEPP


by William Anderson
Published in Reason Magazine, January 1992

Although unpolluted by acid rain,
this clearwater stream in Australia
is highly acidic.

Some people don’t like what Edward Krug has to say about acid rain. That was apparent when he spoke at a seminar on the subject last April in Chattanooga, Tennessee. Krug, a soil scientist who had helped conduct a 10-year federal study of acid rain, spoke with some expertise. He told his audience that he and his fellow researchers on the National Acid Rain Precipitation Assessment Project had determined that acid rain was an environmental nuisance, not a catastrophe.

It was a message that environmentalists didn’t want to hear. One woman hissed at him, “You need to take a reality check.”

Unfortunately for Krug, she isn’t the only one who doesn’t like his ideas. Congress ignored NAPAP’s findings, and when Krug tried to point out that the federal government is forcing utilities to spend billions of dollars to solve a problem that doesn’t exist, a federal agency did everything in its power to keep the media from listening to him. Krug’s research has upset the plans of some of Washington’s most powerful bureaucrats, and they aren’t happy. Because of them, the 44-year-old Krug has experienced numerous reality checks. (more…)

Acid Rain Then, Global Warming Now — An All Too Familiar Pattern For Environmental Scares

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Source:  Lew

The New York Times and Lies about ‘Acid Rain’

by William L. Anderson

As one who often reads the Newspaper of the Ruling Class, the New York Times, I tend not to be surprised when the “Newspaper of Record” distorts the record. Furthermore, one could do nothing but write comments refuting the various economic fallacies and outright distortions that accompany each edition of the Grey Lady.

However, in a recent editorial, the NYT managed to distort the record so much that I find it hard even to know how to answer, except to say that some of us have not lost our memories of what happened 30 years ago. Entitled “Acid Rain 30 Years On,” the editorial starts with the following statement:

Just over 30 years ago, a skeptical Daniel Patrick Moynihan persuaded his Senate colleagues to approve a major study to see whether a relatively unknown phenomenon called acid rain was worth worrying about. The study, completed in 1990, showed that pollution blowing eastward from coal-fired power plants was killing off aquatic life. One-quarter of the Adirondacks’ 3,000 lakes and streams had become too acidic to support fish life, or were headed that way. (more…)

Oxford Union Debate on Climate Catastrophe

Thursday, August 26th, 2010

Source:  Climate Conservation Group

by Richard Treadgold

the Oxford Union building
The lovely old Oxford Union building. It?s nice to know that there are still places where reason and intellect roam free.

[SPPI Note:  The Oxford debate took place earlier this year, in May.]

Science 135, global warming scare 110

For what is believed to be the first time ever in England, an audience of university undergraduates has decisively rejected the notion that ?global warming? is or could become a global crisis. The only previous defeat for climate extremism among an undergraduate audience was at St. Andrew?s University, Scotland, in the spring of 2009, when the climate extremists were defeated by three votes.

Last week, members of the historic Oxford Union Society, the world?s premier debating society, carried the motion ?That this House would put economic growth before combating climate change? by 135 votes to 110. The debate was sponsored by the Science and Public Policy Institute, Washington DC. (more…)